Article Friendly article publishing script homepage.
Translate Page To German Tranlate Page To Spanish Translate Page To French Translate Page To Italian Translate Page To Japanese Translate Page To Korean Translate Page To Portuguese Translate Page To Chinese
  Number Times Read : 4      
Stats
Total Articles: 552591
Total Authors: 46687
Total Downloads: 161291


Newest Member
Ward Vanderkaaden

 
You are at : Home | Arts


   

Bose A20 Versus Lightspeed Zulu Aircraft Headset Comparison



[Valid RSS feed]  Category Rss Feed - http://www.articlehouse.net/rss.php?rss=1
By : Roger Brown    zero times read
Submitted 2011-12-08 05:39:15

Executive Summary:

This review gives a comparison of 2 of the "highest-functioning" aviation headsets available on the market - Bose A20 vs. Lightspeed Zulu.

Aside from a few points off for not being first, with virtually the same features, the Bose headset is simply quieter and less fatiguing.

Price:

Lightspeed Zulu is $800 and Bose A20 is $1095

Comfort: (Clamping force and fit of the ear cup)

Bose

Noise Attenuation:

Bose

Customer Service:

Coin flip

In -Depth Review:

Bose is clearly the leader in Active Noise Reduction (ANR) technology. They have a wide variety of products that employ the science that they push the limits of in their Massachusetts labs and they pretty much own this area of acoustic science. Dr. Bose was an electrical engineering professor at MIT who had a side interest in acoustics.

Comfort:

There are 3 factors that manufacturers consider when designing that contribute to fatigue:

1. Clamping force on the head 2. Weight 3. ANR

1. Clamping force - All of us have flown with cheaper products that feel like clamps. That's because the only way most NON-ANR headsets keep sound out is by forming a tighter seal with our heads. Most comments by users of both headsets are in agreement, the Bose A20 has a lot less clamping force.

2. Weight is a factor that makes virtually no difference when you put a headset on, but after hours in the air with your neck muscles having to support the weight in different twisting and turning angles, an ounce or two makes A LOT of difference. The A20 is super-lightweight - 12 ounces. The Zulu weighs 13.5 ounces.

3. ANR allows for a more comfortable fit because the manufacturer doesn't need to rely only on the seal to keep sound out. This technology "whites-out" ambient sounds. The way this is done is via small microphones that first pick up on ambient sound and then attempts to match it. Bose and Lightspeed products both do this, but the Bose version is clearly more comfortable.

What do actual users of the two headsets say?

Lightspeed - out of 215 comments I found from pilots who fly the Zulu, only 15 had a bad experience (93% positive)Bose - fewer comments positive or negative with Bose…out of 33 comments, only 3 were negative (91% positive) Conclusion: Bose A20 vs. Lightspeed Zulu

• Short flights - If your flights are mostly under 1 hour, save yourself $300 and get the Lightspeed Zulu.

• Long flights - If your flights are mostly over 1 hour, the Bose A20 headset really shines in comfort and reduced fatigue. And, worth every penny of the added costs.

Author Resource:- Roger Brown has been a helicopter and airplane pilot for 40 years. AND, he happens to be crazy about new gadgets. If you want to see detailed comparisons of high-end aviation headsets check out Bose Aviation Headsets.
Article From ARTICLE HOUSE ARTICLES

Related Articles

HTML Ready Article. Click on the "Copy" button to copy into your clipboard.




Firefox users please select/copy/paste as usual
Rate This Article
Vote to see the results!

Do you like this article?
  • Yes.
  • Not Sure.
  • No.
New Members
select
Sign up
select
learn more
Affiliate Sign in
Affiliate Sign In
 
Nav Menu
Home
Login
Submit Articles
Submission Guidelines
Top Articles
Link Directory
About Us
Contact Us
Privacy Policy
RSS Feeds

Actions
Print This Article
Add To Favorites

 
Sponsors

Purchase this software